Week 3 of the Premier League darts on Sky Sports 1 at 7pm, comes from the Odyssey Arena in Belfast.
This weeks matches sees Mervyn King V Ronnie Baxter, Adrian Lewis V Terry Jenkins, Simon Whitlock V Raymond van Barneveld and Phil Taylor V James Wade.
The 1st match sees Mervyn King who - like last year - has got off to a great start to the competition and is 8/15 with Ladbrokes to see off Baxter, who is 4/1 with Sportingbet and 888Sport. The Draw is 5/1 with Betfred.
In Match 2 Adrian Lewis is 5/6 with Sky Bet in a close call with the bookies, against Terry Jenkins who is 9/4 with Coral. The Draw is 4/1 with Paddy Power and Stan James.
Match 3 has former BDO rivals Raymond van Barneveld and Simon Whitlock matching up. The bookies can't seperate these two and have Barney at 11/8 with Totesport and Whitlock at 11/8 with Sportingbet. The Draw is 4/1 with VC Bet.
The game of the night is Match 4 which sees James Wade looking for his first win in this years competition against none other than Phil Taylor. Taylor, you won't be surprised to see is favourite at 4/11 with 888Sport. Wade is 5/1 with Bet365 to cause a massive upset, the Draw is 6/1 with William Hill.
Phil Taylor is the 2/5 favourite with Paddy Power to win the competition outright. He just seems to be going from strength to strength still, as of today he is at the top of the PDC order of merit with £1,087,088 in prize money. To put it into context just how far ahead he is, Barney is 2nd on the list with a mere £277,437.
Wednesday, 24 February 2010
Sunday, 21 February 2010
Ian Poulter the new World Number 5
Ian Poulter's 4&2 win over Paul Casey at the WGC-Accenture Match Play title has seen him move up the World Rankings from 11 to a career high Number 5, it also, all but confirms his participation in the 2010 Ryder Cup at Celtic Manor.
Poulter's game has looked solid all week and he continued his good form against Casey in what was in all honesty a pretty one sided final with Poulter leading from the 7th hole to the finish.
In the previous rounds Poulter seen off Sergio Garcia (7&6), Thongchai Jaidee (1UP), Jeev Milkha Singh (5&4), Adam Scott (2&1) and Justin Leonard at a 19th hole play off.
It is also Poulter's first victory on US soil and hopefully now he has the self belief (not that he lacked it too much before) to go on and claim more titles, and maybe even a major championship before too long.
I sometimes get the impression, when watching Poulter, that he is not the most popular bloke with his golfing peers. Sergio Garcia (who seems one of the more placid players on the circuit) wasn't best pleased with Poulter's attempts to get a free drop at the 7th hole of their Semi-Final and let him know his feelings.
Also got the feeling that he wasn't the most welcome of wild card picks into Nick Faldo's 2008 Ryder Cup team with some of the team mates, he came across as arrogant in not playing in the final qualifying event were he could have claimed an automatic place, although Poulter went on to prove his worth with his performance.
Stories still seem to persist that he doesn't get on with Monty either, the best way to ensure Monty can't leave him out is to keep performing at this level and then there can be no debate this time.
Poulter's game has looked solid all week and he continued his good form against Casey in what was in all honesty a pretty one sided final with Poulter leading from the 7th hole to the finish.
In the previous rounds Poulter seen off Sergio Garcia (7&6), Thongchai Jaidee (1UP), Jeev Milkha Singh (5&4), Adam Scott (2&1) and Justin Leonard at a 19th hole play off.
It is also Poulter's first victory on US soil and hopefully now he has the self belief (not that he lacked it too much before) to go on and claim more titles, and maybe even a major championship before too long.
I sometimes get the impression, when watching Poulter, that he is not the most popular bloke with his golfing peers. Sergio Garcia (who seems one of the more placid players on the circuit) wasn't best pleased with Poulter's attempts to get a free drop at the 7th hole of their Semi-Final and let him know his feelings.
Also got the feeling that he wasn't the most welcome of wild card picks into Nick Faldo's 2008 Ryder Cup team with some of the team mates, he came across as arrogant in not playing in the final qualifying event were he could have claimed an automatic place, although Poulter went on to prove his worth with his performance.
Stories still seem to persist that he doesn't get on with Monty either, the best way to ensure Monty can't leave him out is to keep performing at this level and then there can be no debate this time.
Labels:
Golf,
Ian Poulter
Friday, 19 February 2010
Cipriani off to Melbourne
Danny Cipriani's decision to join Melbourne Rebels in the Super 15 is almost certainly going to rule him out of Martin Johnson's squad for next years World Cup but I can see why he's done what he's done, and to be honest I don't blame him.
He clearly has been given no indication that he has any immeadiate England future as things stand at the moment, and the jury appears to be out over whether this decision should be seen as a negative, in him running away, or a positive step to try and prove he has what it takes to make it at the top.
Should Martin Johnson have made more of an effort to influence him? Did he need an arm around the shoulder and to be made feel more wanted? Who knows.
There are though, stories that Cipriani doesn't knuckle down enough and show enough commitment, Will Carling basically backed up this view a couple of weeks ago when he questioned his ambition to make it too the top.
On the flip side is Cipriani misunderstood? Could it be that England should have embraced his talent and allowed him the freedom to express himself more, even if it meant taking a few hard knocks along the way.
After all it could be said Martin Johnson took a massive backwards step when picking Andy Goode for the 2009 Six Nations and abandoning Englands efforts (with Cipriani at fly half) from the 2008 autumn internationals to play a running game after a couple of heavy defeats.
I just hope this doesn't go against Cipriani in the long run and that Martin Johnson can see some good in the move and look at it all from a positive perspective.
After all, the move could have the right effect for him and turn him into the match winner we have been continually told he will be. I can't see him getting an easy ride in Australia with their competitive nature, this could turn out to be a good finishing school and be the making of him.
It could also prove to be a good move as he is sure to be encouraged to play a far more expansive running game, all this could be England's gain when (and if) he comes back at the end of his two year contract.
He clearly has been given no indication that he has any immeadiate England future as things stand at the moment, and the jury appears to be out over whether this decision should be seen as a negative, in him running away, or a positive step to try and prove he has what it takes to make it at the top.
Should Martin Johnson have made more of an effort to influence him? Did he need an arm around the shoulder and to be made feel more wanted? Who knows.
There are though, stories that Cipriani doesn't knuckle down enough and show enough commitment, Will Carling basically backed up this view a couple of weeks ago when he questioned his ambition to make it too the top.
On the flip side is Cipriani misunderstood? Could it be that England should have embraced his talent and allowed him the freedom to express himself more, even if it meant taking a few hard knocks along the way.
After all it could be said Martin Johnson took a massive backwards step when picking Andy Goode for the 2009 Six Nations and abandoning Englands efforts (with Cipriani at fly half) from the 2008 autumn internationals to play a running game after a couple of heavy defeats.
I just hope this doesn't go against Cipriani in the long run and that Martin Johnson can see some good in the move and look at it all from a positive perspective.
After all, the move could have the right effect for him and turn him into the match winner we have been continually told he will be. I can't see him getting an easy ride in Australia with their competitive nature, this could turn out to be a good finishing school and be the making of him.
It could also prove to be a good move as he is sure to be encouraged to play a far more expansive running game, all this could be England's gain when (and if) he comes back at the end of his two year contract.
Labels:
Danny Cipriani,
Rugby Union
What did Tiger Woods statement really say?
Tiger Woods eventually came out of hiding and faced a certain element of the media when he read out his well prepared statement at the US PGA Tour headquarters in Florida on Friday.
Humbled, broken and humiliated he may have looked and sounded, but I'm still not convinced by this latest performance. I found the timing and the nature of the whole event incredibly arrogant and Woods did little to convince me he will be any different or more humble and respectful when he eventually returns to golf.
Will his on course etiquette change? Will we see an end to his spitting on the cousre, his swearing and throwing of clubs in temper, his point blank refusal to sign any autographs for kids? One thing for sure is that nothing is likely to change with the American PGA not taking him to task over any of this, given their pandering to him in allowing him to disrupt the current Match Play Championship.
His performance at his stage-managed event with hand picked guests on Friday left me wondering if he really gets the point. It said to me that he is still a control freak and even in this period where he should be more contrite, that the whole show has still got to be run to suit him, and just him.
He still seemed self obsessed and at times tried to play the 'look what a good guy I've been in the past' card when he stated facts about his father and the foundation they set up.
Would the kids and fans he later claimed to have let down be the same ones he marches past without so much as a glance towards, let alone an autograph signed for, after every round?
Anyone who expected to perhaps see Woods bear his soul would have been disappointed, instead he used the event as a platform to get his own points across. He attacked the media for intrusion, attcked them for fabricating stories about his wife beating him up and him using performance enhancing drugs, and bizarrely claimed to have refound Buddhism.
In fairness to the media all that they have been doing is filling in the gaps left in his stories, the same gaps that still remain today after this statement.
He is right to say that it is private business between himself and his wife, as it is no one elses business. But when you don't give the media the story they want, be prepared for them to keep digging.
He is surely not that naive not to be able to work that one out?
I do agree with him that the press following his wife and kids around is out of order, but what does he expect when he is not giving them anything? To ask them to leave them alone is fair enough, but to expect them to get off his back under these circumstances isn't on, asking people not to do their jobs just because it dosen't suit him is yet another example of his arrogance.
The fact that he chose to do this in the middle of WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship could be interpretated as a way of getting one back over Accenture for dropping him in the aftermath of the scandal.
It wasn't lost on his fellow pros, with the likes of Ernie Els, Paul Casey and Oliver Wilson all being critical of the timing. For me his effort to thank the players for understanding this sounded a bit shallow.
Sir Nick Faldo echoed this with his comment that Woods is paying the therapist who apparently only gave him a small window of opportunity between treatments to release his statement, suggesting that Woods is the man really calling the shots. Describing it, Faldo said "I don't buy that one."
Of the American PGA Tour, in allowing him the use of their HQ in the middle of the match play shows just how desperate they are for him to return and how it would appear that they still can't say No to him.
The Golf Writers Association of America were less sympathetic towards him though. On hearing that they would only be allowed three seats (later increased to six after negotiations) and that no questions would be allowed to be asked, they boycotted the event saying "To limit the ability of journalists to attend, listen, see and question Woods goes against the grain of everything we believe".
In concluding, the overall impression that I was left with is that he regrets getting caught and losing his aura of superiority more than anything else. He hand picked the audience to ensure that no awkward questions could be asked. In what was supposed to be an apology, he spoke more about himself than anyone else.
He also used it as an opportunity to say what didn't happen, rather than what did happen. An opportunity to attack the press and then ask for privacy, an opportunity to clear his name over other accusations.
That to me isn't a grovelling apology, it is more like the actions of an arrogant man who is still full of self importance and still thinks that the world revolves around him, sadly the American PGA seem to be confirming to Woods that is does.
Humbled, broken and humiliated he may have looked and sounded, but I'm still not convinced by this latest performance. I found the timing and the nature of the whole event incredibly arrogant and Woods did little to convince me he will be any different or more humble and respectful when he eventually returns to golf.
Will his on course etiquette change? Will we see an end to his spitting on the cousre, his swearing and throwing of clubs in temper, his point blank refusal to sign any autographs for kids? One thing for sure is that nothing is likely to change with the American PGA not taking him to task over any of this, given their pandering to him in allowing him to disrupt the current Match Play Championship.
His performance at his stage-managed event with hand picked guests on Friday left me wondering if he really gets the point. It said to me that he is still a control freak and even in this period where he should be more contrite, that the whole show has still got to be run to suit him, and just him.
He still seemed self obsessed and at times tried to play the 'look what a good guy I've been in the past' card when he stated facts about his father and the foundation they set up.
Would the kids and fans he later claimed to have let down be the same ones he marches past without so much as a glance towards, let alone an autograph signed for, after every round?
Anyone who expected to perhaps see Woods bear his soul would have been disappointed, instead he used the event as a platform to get his own points across. He attacked the media for intrusion, attcked them for fabricating stories about his wife beating him up and him using performance enhancing drugs, and bizarrely claimed to have refound Buddhism.
In fairness to the media all that they have been doing is filling in the gaps left in his stories, the same gaps that still remain today after this statement.
He is right to say that it is private business between himself and his wife, as it is no one elses business. But when you don't give the media the story they want, be prepared for them to keep digging.
He is surely not that naive not to be able to work that one out?
I do agree with him that the press following his wife and kids around is out of order, but what does he expect when he is not giving them anything? To ask them to leave them alone is fair enough, but to expect them to get off his back under these circumstances isn't on, asking people not to do their jobs just because it dosen't suit him is yet another example of his arrogance.
The fact that he chose to do this in the middle of WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship could be interpretated as a way of getting one back over Accenture for dropping him in the aftermath of the scandal.
It wasn't lost on his fellow pros, with the likes of Ernie Els, Paul Casey and Oliver Wilson all being critical of the timing. For me his effort to thank the players for understanding this sounded a bit shallow.
Sir Nick Faldo echoed this with his comment that Woods is paying the therapist who apparently only gave him a small window of opportunity between treatments to release his statement, suggesting that Woods is the man really calling the shots. Describing it, Faldo said "I don't buy that one."
Of the American PGA Tour, in allowing him the use of their HQ in the middle of the match play shows just how desperate they are for him to return and how it would appear that they still can't say No to him.
The Golf Writers Association of America were less sympathetic towards him though. On hearing that they would only be allowed three seats (later increased to six after negotiations) and that no questions would be allowed to be asked, they boycotted the event saying "To limit the ability of journalists to attend, listen, see and question Woods goes against the grain of everything we believe".
In concluding, the overall impression that I was left with is that he regrets getting caught and losing his aura of superiority more than anything else. He hand picked the audience to ensure that no awkward questions could be asked. In what was supposed to be an apology, he spoke more about himself than anyone else.
He also used it as an opportunity to say what didn't happen, rather than what did happen. An opportunity to attack the press and then ask for privacy, an opportunity to clear his name over other accusations.
That to me isn't a grovelling apology, it is more like the actions of an arrogant man who is still full of self importance and still thinks that the world revolves around him, sadly the American PGA seem to be confirming to Woods that is does.
Labels:
Golf,
Tiger Woods
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)